by President J. Reuben Clark, Jr.

(Delivered at the Saturday morning session, April 6, 1957.)

	MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS, contrary to my usual custom and 
practice, I intend to read what I have to say today.  I assure you I 
have tried to prepare it under the influence of our Heavenly Father, 
and I humbly pray that it will carry the message which I had hoped for.

	I plan to say something today about the Constitution of the
United States of America -- its Framers and some of its essential
principles -- America, the land choice above all other lands -- for our 
great and priceless liberties, including the security of our homes and 
property, our freedom of speech and of the press, freedom Of religion 
and the free exercise thereof, indeed freedom itself and its liberties, 
as our fathers knew and enjoyed, as also ourselves, depend upon its 
preservation.  As there is much detail and as I wish to be as accurate 
as I may be, I have written out what I wish to say.

	It seems wise to remind ourselves of these matters because some 
people belittle that great document and its fundamental principles, 
sometimes to the point of derision.  Sometimes we forget it.

Constitution "Outmoded"

	These defamers say that the Constitution, and our government
under it, are outmoded; not responsive to present-day conditions of life 
and living; not sufficient to meet and solve present-day problems; and 
that we need a modern, up-to-date system of government. They let us know 
what should be done to meet their ideas and plans, which seem always to 
run to despotism.

	I have observed that numbers of these defamers take advantage 
to the utmost of every liberty and freedom created and protected by the 
Constitution in order to destroy it and its guarantees, so to make easy 
the setting up of a tyranny that would deprive the common man of his 
freedom and liberties under it, so permitting these defamers to set up 
a government that would give place, power, and privilege to them in a 
despotism to be imposed upon the mass of mankind. We have witnessed 
this very despotism.  There would be a Kremlin in every country on the
globe, all under the super-Kremlin in Moscow.

Ten Commandments "Outmoded"

	One class of these defamers are the same persons who declare
the Ten Commandments, the basic law of the civilized world, to be
outmoded, although these Commandments still speak with their divine 
power and authority against the same evils existing today, each one of 
them, not one missing, even as they existed in the days of Moses; 
Commandments that proclaim righteous principles that are as valid and 
applicable today as when, on Mt. Sinai, they were written on slabs of 
stone by the finger of God.  Sinners would get rid of the divine 
rebukes and penalties prescribed for their wickedness and would treat 
as naught the promised rewards for that righteous life that would rob 
them of the fleshly pleasures of sin.

Sermon on the Mount "Outmoded"

	The same people declare the Sermon on the Mount to be outmoded, 
irresponsive to the needs of the people of today.  The divine truths 
of the Sermon, its surpassing loveliness, indeed the sublimity of its 
ethical teachings, do not, say they, harmonize with their modern life 
where we see greed, ambition, selfishness, dishonesty, deceit, falsehood, 
and licentiousness thrive and on which they live and riot. We have noted 
this experiment also.

	If all that God and his Only Begotten taught that will lead us 
to the immortality and eternal life that is God's declared glory, could 
be wiped out and forgotten, leaving only Satan and his work, the followers 
of Satan would, in their ignorance, have reached a Satanic heaven.

Organization of Constitutional Convention

	The Constitution of the United States was framed in Independence 
Hall, Philadelphia, May 14, 1787, to September 17, 1787.  The Framers 
were delegates sent thereto by "the Thirteen Colonies.  Seventy-four 
were appointed; fifty-five reported at the Convention; nineteen did not 
attend; thirty-nine signed the Constitution. Representatives signed from 
each of the Colonies except Rhode Island.

Bill of Rights

	The Constitution as signed lacked a Bill of Rights, though
these rights were discussed in the Convention.  As the Colonies voted 
to ratify the Constitution, each proposed amendments to remedy the 
omission.  Over one hundred amendments were proposed. Some forty to 
fifty were eliminated as duplications. Seventeen were finally approved 
by the House of the First Congress; the Senate reduced the number to 
twelve, which were sent to the various legislatures for ratification.  
The, final returns showed that ten had been ratified.

Historical Experience of Framers

	The Framers and their fathers had in the preceding seventy-five 
years, fought through four purely European wars -- in America between 
the British and her colonists on one side, and the French and her Indian 
allies on the other.  The colonists had little, if any, concern in the 
European issues.  They fought because the homelands fought. In the first 
three of these wars the colonists lost much, suffered massacres. Yet at 
the end of each war, each European government returned, each to the 
other, the gains either had made in America.  The colonists had heavy
losses, had no gains except the experience that builded up over the 
decades, experience that aided them, first, in winning their independence, 
and, thereafter, in establishing this Government.

	No wonder Washington in his Farewell Address counseled against 
foreign entanglements.  He stated the reasons drawn from colonial 

	The French and Indian War, the last of the four, broke the French 
foothold on the Continent.  Washington participated in that war as an 
officer and suffered in Braddock's defeat at Fort Duquesne.

	During a part of this whole period, the colonial legislatures 
had been fighting against royal representatives; in the earlier decade 
the fathers of the Framers carried on these contests; in the latter 
years, many of the Framers were themselves involved.

Movement for Independence

	The movement for independence began soon after the close of the 
French and Indian War; for example, the Committees of Correspondence. 
Some of the very best minds and ablest men in the Colonies participated.  
Framers served on these earlier revolutionary bodies. Many Framers were 
members of the Continental Congress.  When the Revolution came, they 
had the experiences, bitter as to both men and money, that came to that
Congress in raising troops and materials of war. They had knowledge.  
Some were experienced in, the actual problems of conducting a war. One 
at least, Franklin, had seen distinguished service in the diplomatic 
field and continued so to serve.

Characters of Framers

	The Framers were men of affairs in their own right.  Some were 
distinguished financiers.  More than half of them were university men, 
some educated in the leading American colleges --Harvard, Yale, Columbia,
Princeton, William and Mary; others in the great colleges of Great 
Britain -- Oxford, Glasgow, Edinburgh.  Washington and Franklin were 
among those who had no college education.  Altogether there were 
seventy-four delegates appointed; fifty-five who reported at the 
Convention, "all of them," it has been said, "respectable for family 
and for personal qualities." Of these fifty-five, only thirty-nine were 
present at the signing. Nineteen failed to attend.

	They were men of varied political beliefs. Some were Federalists; 
some anti-Federalists.  Some seemed favorable to a mere revamping of the 
Articles of Confederation.  

	The amazing thing is that there was not in all the world's
history a government organization even among confederacies, that could 
be taken by the Framers as a preliminary blueprint for building the 
political structure they were to build. Franklin declared: 

	"We have gone back to ancient history for models of Government,
and examined the different forms of those Republics which, having been 
formed with the seeds of their own dissolution, now no longer exist.  
And we have viewed Modern States all round Europe, but find none of 
their Constitutions suitable to our circumstances."

	They had been in session for about a month (June 26, 1787)
when Madison declared: 

	". . . as it was more than probable we were now digesting a
plan which in its operation would decide forever the fate of Republican 
Government we ought not only to provide every guard to liberty that its 
preservation could require, but be equally careful to supply the defects 
which our own experience had particularly pointed out."

Who the Framers Were

	A little further detail about the thirty-nine Framers who
actually signed the document will be useful.

	Of those thirty-nine signers, twenty. six had seen service in 
the Continental Congress.  They knew legislative processes and problems. 
Thirteen had served both in the Continental Congress and in the Army.  
What a wealth of experience they had obtained in both legislative and 
executive duties!  Of the nineteen who served in the Army, seventeen 
had served as officers -- they knew the problems of armed forces in the 
field; and of these seventeen, four had served on Washington's staff.

	Let us go down the roll: Washington, the "Father of his Country," 
and Madison, sometimes called the "Father of the Constitution," were 
later Presidents of the United States.  Hamilton (a financial genius) 
was Secretary of the Treasury under Washington.  McHenry (Maryland) was 
Secretary of War under Washington.  Randolph (Virginia) acted as 
Attorney General for Washington and later as his Secretary of State. 
Rutledge (South Carolina), a distinguished jurist, was later Chief 
Justice in the United States Supreme Court. Oliver Ellsworth (absent 
when the Constitution was signed) was also later a Chief Justice of the
Supreme Court. Blair, Paterson, and Wilson were later Justices of the 
Supreme Court.  (Wilson had been on the Board of War and Ordnance in 
the Second Continental Congress.)

	Benjamin Franklin, a philosopher and scientist, had behind him 
years of most distinguished and successful diplomatic service. King 
(Massachusetts) was later a Senator and thereafter Minister to Great 
Britain. Charles Pinckney (South Carolina) was Minister to Spain. 
Dickinson (Delaware) founded Dickinson College, and Johnson (Connecticut) 
was President of Columbia College. Gerry (Massachusetts) was later 
Vice President of the United States, and Ingersoll (Pennsylvania) a 
candidate for the Vice-Presidency.

	Gorham (Massachusetts) and Mifflin (Pennsylvania) had been
Presidents of the Continental Congress; Clymer (Pennsylvania), Continental 
Treasurer; Robert Morris (Pennsylvania), Superintendent of Finances; 
Sherman (Connecticut), a member of the Board of War and Ordnance, all 
in the Continental Congress.

	We might add, as among the most distinguished of this group,
the other Morris (Governor) from Pennsylvania, and the other Pinckney 
(Charles Cotesworth) from South Carolina.

	There were many other distinguished men.  They were distinguished 
before the time of the Convention; they won great distinction after.  
Men of affairs and influence, they were in their respective Colonies, 
later States.  They were all seasoned patriots of loftiest patriotism.  
They were not backwoodsmen from the far-off frontiers, not one of them.

	What a group of men of surpassing abilities, attainments,
experience, and achievements!  There has not been another such group of 
men in all the one hundred seventy years of our history, no group that 
even challenged the supremacy of this group. Gladstone solemnly declared: 

	"The American Constitution is the most wonderful work ever struck 
off at a given time by the brain and purpose of man."

When God Plows His Furrow

	When God puts his hand to the plow, his furrow is deep and
straight, clear to the end.  God gave us the heritage; ours is the duty 
to cherish and protect it.  We have, as a people, a special relationship 
to these men and their work.

	In a revelation to Joseph at Kirtland at the time of some of
the darkest days in Missouri (December 16, 1833), when there seemed to 
be no protection for the Saints from the civil authorities, the Lord 
spoke. He told the people to continue to "importune for redress. 

	"According to the laws and constitution of the people, which
I have suffered to be established, and should be maintained for the 
rights and protection of all flesh, according to just and holy 

	"That every man may act in doctrine and principle pertaining
to futurity, according to the moral agency which I have given unto him,
that every man may be accountable for his own sins in the day of judgment.

	"Therefore, it is not right that any man should be in bondage 
one to another.

	"And for this purpose have I established the Constitution of
this land, by the hands of wise men whom I raised up unto this very 
purpose, and redeemed the land by the shedding of blood."(D&C 101:77-80.)

	A little time before this, the Lord declared that the 
constitutional "principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, 
belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me," and that the 
people should "renounce war and proclaim peace." (August 6, 1833, ibid.,
98:5, 16.)

	When (1833) the Lord gave these approving revelations, the
Constitution with its coterminous Bill of Rights, was almost fifty years 
old. Two amendments only had then been made; one (1798) concerned the 
Federal judicial power, the other (1804) the election of President and 
Vice President.  Some thirty years later (1865, 1868) came the next 
two amendments terminating slavery and guaranteeing citizenship and its 
protection, so meeting the principle declared by the Lord in 1833 
regarding bondage of men, one to another.

	In the prayer of dedication of the Kirtland Temple, the Prophet 
prayed: ". . . may those principles, which were so honorably and nobly 
defended, namely, the Constitution of our land, by our fathers, be 
established forever." (Ibid., 109:54, March 27, 1836.)

	In 1835 (August 17), at a general assembly of the Church held 
at Kirtland, a far-reaching "Declaration of Belief regarding Governments 
and Laws in general" was adopted by the Saints. (Ibid., 134.)

	These Framers of the Constitution were the men whom the Lord
"raised up unto this very purpose, and redeemed the land by the shedding 
of blood," making it ready for the blessings proclaimed for all.

Preparation of Framers

	No more clearly does it appear that Moses was so trained in
the royal Egyptian courts that he could lead ancient Israel out of 
bondage, or that Brother Brigham was so trained, in directing the 
exodus of the Saints from Missouri to Nauvoo, that he could lead modern 
Israel from the mobbings and persecutions of the East to the freedom 
of the mountain fastnesses of the West; neither one was more clearly 
trained for his work than these Framers were trained for theirs -- rich 
in intellectual endowment and ripened in experience. They were equally 
as the others in God's hands; he guided them in their epoch-making 
deliberations in Independence Hall.

	The Framers were deeply read in the facts of history; they
were learned in the forms and practices and systems of the governments 
of the world, past and present; they were, in matters political, equally 
at home in Rome, in Athens, in Paris, and in London; they had a long, 
varied, and intense experience in the work of governing their various 
Colonies; they were among the leaders of a weak and poor people that 
had successfully fought a revolution against one of the great Powers 
of the earth; there were among them some of the ablest, most experienced 
and seasoned military leaders of the world.

	As to all matters under consideration by the Convention, the
history of the world was combed for applicable experiences and precedents.

	The whole training and experiences of the colonists had been
in the Common Law, with its freedoms and liberties even under their 
kings. They knew the functions of legislative, executive, and judicial 
arms of government.

Some Constitutional Principles

	Time is not available now to consider in detail the work of the 
Convention nor the Constitution that was framed. A very few principles 
only, and they among the basic ones, may be mentioned.  You all know 
them; they are now merely recalled to your minds. Sometimes we miss 
the import of them.

Three Independent Branches

	First--The Constitution provided for three departments of
government -- tide legislative, the executive, and the judicial.

        These departments are mutually independent the one from the other.
	Each department was endowed with all the powers and authority 
that the people through the Constitution conferred upon that branch of 
government --the legislative, the executive, and the judicial, 

No Encroachment by One Branch Upon Another

	No branch of the government might encroach upon the powers
conferred upon another branch of government.  In order to forestall 
foreseeable encroachments, the Convention provided in the Constitution 
itself for a very few invasions by one or the other, into one of the 
other departments, to make sure that one department should not absorb 
the functions of the other or encroach thereon, or gain an overbalancing 
power and authority against the other.  These have been termed "checks 
and balances."

Non-delegation of Powers

	A third principle that was inherent in all the provisions of
the Constitution was that none of the departments could delegate its 
powers to the others.  The courts of the country have from the first 
insisted upon the operation of this principle.  There have been some 
fancy near-approaches to such an attempted delegation, particularly 
in recent years, and some unique justifying reasoning therefor, but the 
courts have consistently insisted upon the basic principle, which is 
still operative.

	An examination of the records of the Convention will show how 
anxiously earnest the Framers were to set up these and other principles 
of free government.

No Kings in America

	The Convention seems to have experienced no really serious
difficulty in setting up a judiciary department, nor, in certain
aspects, the legislative department with its powers, until it came to 
those powers which dealt with matters that in some governments had been 
regarded as belonging to the executive. You will recollect that 
practically all of these Framers had suffered under George III and his 
Minister, Lord North.  So they abandoned the British model, for, as 
Randolph said, ". . . the fixt genius of the people of America required 
a different form of Government." This ruled out royalty.

	It might be noted that Washington, as the Revolution closed,
had definitively scotched at Newburgh, the kingship idea.

Kings and America

	Of course, the Framers did not know (no living mortal then knew) 
that centuries before a prophet of the Lord had declared as to America: 

	"Behold, this is a choice land, and whatsoever nation shall
possess it shall be free from bondage, and from captivity, and from all 
other nations under heaven, if they will but serve the God of the land,
who is Jesus Christ, who hath been manifested by the things which we 
have written." (Ether 2:12.)

	Nor did the Framers know (again, no living mortal then knew)
that centuries after this prophecy, but still centuries before the 
Framers met, another prophet had declared: 

	"And this land shall, be a land of liberty unto the Gentiles,
and there shall be no kings upon the land, who shall raise up unto the 
Gentiles." (2 Nephi 10:11.)

	The unhappy, short-lived experiences of the Dom Pedros in Brazil 
and of Maximilian in Mexico seem the exceptions that prove the rule. 
The Spirit of the Lord was leading.

The National Executive

	In providing for the executive department, there was considerable 
discussion as to whether the executive department should be one person 
or several.  Commenting upon a proposal for three, Randolph said their 
unity would be "as the foetus of monarchy."

	Who should choose, elect, or appoint (the terms were used
almost interchangeably) the Chief Executive was exhaustively debated; 
so was the problem of the length of his term, from one year, to Hamilton's 
during "good behaviour," including the question whether he should be 
ineligible for re-election; and whether he should be subject to 

Power to Declare War

	But one of their most searching examinations related to the war 
powers of government, including the power to declare war. It became 
clear very early in the debates that as Chief Executive, the President 
should execute the laws passed by Congress.  But he was also made 
Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States and of the 
State Militia when called into the service of the United States.  The 
delegates were fearfully anxious over this function of government. There 
was one suggestion that the Commander in Chief should not personally 
go into the field with the troops, so fearful were they of his power.

Where War Powers Rest

	But in whom should rest the so-called war powers? This was the 
urgent problem.  It soon became clear that the Convention was unalterably 
opposed to endowing the President with these war powers; it was conceded 
he should have the power to repel invasions, but not to commence war, 
which meant he could not declare war.

Chief Executives Conceived as Plain Human Beings

	Some of the arguments made in this connection, involving the
possibility of a military usurper, remind one of the potential
calamities pictured by Lincoln in his prophetic Lyceum Address, where 
he sketched what an ambitious, fame-and-power-seeking executive might 

	Various other potential actions by the executive were explored.
Future Presidents of the Republic were conceived as including men 
capable of doing the things that ambitious men in power had done over 
the ages.  Men were still human, had the same urges and ambitions.  
The earnest effort was to make as nearly impossible as could be, the 
malfeasances of the past by men in high executive office in the future; 
and seemingly perhaps beyond everything else as a practical matter, to 
prevent the President from taking us into war of his own volition.  The 
Framers therefore provided that the war powers, including the declaration
of war, should rest exclusively in the Congress, both by express
provisions, and, as the record shows, by the conscious intent of the 

The Net Position of the National Executive

	The net result may be stated thus: as Chief Executive the
President was to enforce the laws passed by Congress, including those 
passed by Congress in the exercise of the war powers that were explicitly 
and exclusively possessed by Congress; as Commander in Chief of the Army 
and Navy of the United States and of the Militia of the States when 
called into the actual service of the United States, he was to direct 
the military operations thereof in the field, with the powers incident 

	These principles should never be forgotten by any free, liberty- 
loving American, the kind of American the Constitution and the Bill of 
Rights make of us, and in which they were designed to protect us.

The People Are Sovereign

	Furthermore, under our form of government, we the people of the 
United States, as the Preamble to the Constitution declares, formed this 
government. We alone are sovereign. We are wholly free to exercise our 
sovereign will in the way we prescribe.  The sovereignty is not personal, 
as under the Civil Law. The Constitution expressly provides the only 
way in which we may change our Constitution.

	We may well repeat again: We the people have all the powers,
we have not delegated away to our government, and the institutions of 
government have such powers and those only as we have given to them. 
The total residuum of powers, including all rights and liberties not 
given up by us to Federal or State Governments, is still in us, to 
remain so till we constitutionally provide otherwise. Under the Civil 
Law that basically governs Continental Europe, the people have only 
such rights as a personal sovereign or his equivalent bestows, the
residuum remaining in him or them. Wherever and whenever powers are 
exercised by any person or branch of our government that are not, granted 
by the Constitution, such powers are to that extent usurpations.

The Constitution and Ourselves

	Will not each of you ask yourself this question: What would
probably have happened if Joseph Smith had been born and had attempted 
to carry on his work of the Restoration of the Gospel and the Holy 
Priesthood, if he had been born and had sought to go forward in any 
other country in the world?

	Must we go far to seek why God set up this people and their
government, the only government on the face of the earth, since the 
Master was here, that God has formally declared was set up at the hands 
of men whom he raised up for that very purpose, and the fundamental 
principles of which he has expressly approved?

Constitution Is Part of My Religion

	Having in mind what the Lord has said about the Constitution
and its Framers, that the Constitution should be "established, and 
should be maintained for the rights and protection of all flesh," that 
it was for the protection of the moral agency, free agency, God gave 
us, that its "principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, 
belongs to all mankind," all of which point to the destiny of the free 
government our Constitution provides, unless thrown away by the nations- 
having in mind all this, with its implications, speaking for myself, I
declare that the divine sanction thus repeatedly given by the Lord 
himself to the Constitution of the United States as it came from the 
hands of the Framers with its coterminous Bill of Rights, makes of the 
principles of that document an integral part of my religious faith. It 
is a revelation from the Lord.  I believe and reverence its God-inspired 
provisions. My faith, my knowledge, my testimony of the Restored Gospel, 
based on the divine principle of continuous revelation, compel me so 
to believe.  Thus has the Lord approved of our political system, an
approval, so far as I know, such as he has given to no other political 
system of any other people in the world since the time of Jesus.

	The Constitution, as approved by the Lord, is still the, same 
great vanguard of liberty and freedom in human government that it was 
the day it was written.  No other human system of government, affording 
equal protection for human life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, 
has yet been devised or vouchsafed to man.  Its great principles are as 
applicable, efficient, and sufficient to bring today the greatest good 
to the greatest number, as they were the day the Constitution was signed. 
Our Constitution and our Government under it, were designed by God as
an instrumentality for righteousness through peace, not war.



Our Constitutional Destiny       

  Speaking of the destiny that the Lord has offered to mankind
in his declarations regarding the scope and efficacy of the Constitution 
and its principles, we may note that already the Lord has moved upon 
many nations of the earth so to go forward. The Latin American countries 
have followed our lead and adopted our constitutional form of government, 
adapted to their legal concepts, without compulsion or restraint from 
us.  Likewise, the people of Canada in the British North America Act 
have embodied great principles that are basic to our Constitution. The 
people of Australia have likewise followed along our governmental
footpath. In Canada and in Australia, the great constitutional
decisions of John Marshall and his associates are quoted in their courts 
and followed in their adjudications.  I repeat, none of this has come 
because of force of arms.  The Constitution will never reach its destiny 
through force. God's principles are taken by men because they are 
eternal and true and touch the divine spirit in men.  This is the only 
true way to permanent world peace, the aspiration of men since the 
beginning. God never planted his Spirit, his truth, in the hearts of 
men from the point of a bayonet.

         The Framers had their dark days, in their work.  There were
discouragementís, there were hours of near hopelessness for some. 
Yet, as they were engaged in God's work, and he was at the helm,
we know it was as certain as the day dawn, that Satan would be
there also, with his thwarting designs.

	But I see in their divers views, their different concepts,
even the promotion of their different local interests, not the
confusion which challenged Franklin, but a searching, almost
meticulous study and examination of the fundamental principles
involved, and the final adoption of the wisest and best of it all
I see the winnowing of the wheat, the blowing away of the chaff.

Franklin's Prayer

	On one of these dark days, the venerable Franklin, ripe in
years and in experience, arose and spoke to the Convention (June
28, 1787).  Said he: 

	"The small progress we have, made after 4 or five weeks
close attendance & continual reasonings with each other -- our
different sentiments on almost every question, several of the
last producing as many noes as ays, is me-thinks a melancholy
proof of the imperfection of the Human Understanding. We indeed
seem to feel our own want of political wisdom, since we have been
running about in search of it. We have gone back to ancient
history for models of Government, and examined the different
forms of those Republics which having been formed with the seeds
of their own dissolution now no longer exist. And we have viewed
Modern States all round Europe, but find none of their
Constitutions suitable to our circumstances.

	"In this situation of this Assembly, groping as it were in
the dark to find political truth, and scarce able to distinguish
it when presented to us, how has it happened, Sir, that we have
not hitherto once thought of humbly applying to the Father of
lights to illuminate our understandings? In the beginning of the
Contest with G. Britain, when we were sensible of danger we had
daily prayer in this room for the divine protection. Our prayers,
Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who
were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent
instances of a Superintending providence in our favor.  To that
kind providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in
peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. 
And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? or do we imagine
that we no longer need his assistance? I have lived, Sir, a long
time, and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of
this truth--that God governs in the affairs of men.  And if a
sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it
probable that an empire can rise without his aid? We have been
assured, Sir, in the sacred writings, that 'except the Lord build
the House they labour in vain that build it.' I firmly believe
this; and I also believe that without his concurring aid we shall
succeed in this political building no better than the Builders of
Babel: We shall be divided by our little partial local interests;
our projects will be confounded, and we ourselves shall become a
reproach and bye word down to future ages. And what is worse,
mankind may hereafter from this unfortunate instance, despair of
establishing Governments by Human Wisdom and leave it to chance,
war and conquest." So spoke Franklin.

My Witness

	Out of more years, but of far, far less wisdom and
experience, I echo Franklin's testimony "that God governs in the
affairs of men," and that without his concurring aid we shall
build in vain, and "our projects will be confounded, and we
ourselves shall become a reproach and, bye word down to future

	I bear my testimony that without God's aid, we shall not
preserve our political heritage neither to our own blessing, nor
to the blessing of our posterity, nor to the blessing of the
downtrodden peoples of the world.

	In broad outline, the Lord has declared through our
Constitution his form for human government.  Our Own prophets
have declared in our day the responsibility of the Elders of Zion
in the preservation of the Constitution. We cannot, guiltless,
escape that responsibility.  We cannot be laggards, nor can we be

	On the back of the chair in which Washington sat as
President during the Convention, was carved a half-hidden sun,
showing just above a range of hills. As the signing of the
Constitution was about over, Franklin observed to some fellow

	"I have often and often, in the course of the session, and
the vicissitudes of my hopes and fears as to its issue, looked at
that (sun) behind the President, without being able to tell
whether it was rising or setting; but now, at length, I have the
happiness to know that it is a rising, and not a setting sun."

	Such was the prophecy that marked the closing of the
greatest political convention of all time for the Lord was there
working out his purposes in a system he could endorse.

	God give us the power, each of us, to enshrine in our hearts
the eternal truths of our Constitution; that come what may, we
shall never desert these truths, but work always and unceasingly
that, as Lincoln said, "government of the people, by the people,
for the people, shall not perish from the earth."

	Such is my prayer, and I ask it in, the name of Jesus. Amen.

Return to the Constition and Mormonism Home Page!:

This page has been visited times.